January: Halfway Post

PRO:

Counterparts (Jan Bonny, 2007)
The inexplicable recipient of middling reception at Cannes 2007 (sample review quote: “Absence of music also reinforces the small-screen feel”; amazingly, it seems I have watched much more TV than Variety’s Derek Elley), this feature debut employs Dardennes-style camerawork and editing to glorious effect. The scenario, a domestic-abuse relationship with the roles reversed, is played blessedly free of sensationalism: Bonny has a fine-tuned and unusual sense, for example, of the “triggers” afflicting the abuser, such as overdeliberate attempts at reconciliation on the part of the abused. Is she horrific, or is he merely sentimental? On and on it goes…

Falbalas (Jacques Becker, 1945)
This Becker masterpiece is a miracle of acting style trumping shot duration: visuals fly by at a rapid clip, all charged with latent emotion. I’ll be thinking of Becker’s terse dissolves on suggestive facial expressions when polishing my own screenplay. Patience does not necessarily equal wisdom.

pro:

The Wackness (Jonathan Levine, 2008)
From the likes of this and the less impressive All the Boys Love Mandy Lane (not written by Levine), Levine is working out a preoccupation with a social middle ground of sorts, and in this case an ambivalence about youthful abandon. We’re not talking about a Stillman-esque take on the pros and cons of a modern social class system so much as an illustration of an attempt to live life as if that system doesn’t exist, ultimately semi-conceding to it. My biggest quibble is what seems to me a rather mild depiction of benzodiazepine withdrawal, which is a hell I wouldn’t wish on Hitler.

Beauty #2 (Andy Warhol, 1965)
Long stretches of boredom, as usual, permeate this one-take opus, but it steadily develops into an indelibly reflexive take on voyeurism: the position of the camera makes the unwanted observer newly tantalizing.

Slumming (Michael Glawogger, 2006)
Seems to be about revenge, then redemption, and finally eviscerates any kind of straightforward moral oomph. The point, going off the observations of the spoiled Austrian kids, and later on, the Filipino drinking buddies, is that it’s fun, but probably wrong, to try to guess what’s really going on with someone. Admirable, but bizarre.

Guernsey (Nanouk Leopold, 2005)
Both this and Wolfsbergen are detached and elliptical in the manner of Haneke—shots are filmed at about twice the distance they need to be, although Leopold occasionally varies from master-shot mode—particularly Code Unknown. All we need to know, apparently, is that the protagonist travels, has become used to it, willingly trusts most people but operates underneath a constant veil of coldness. Performances are typically muted, but occasionally quite interesting. Sample moment: protag’ll ask a question—“do you think of her now and then?”—and then turn away in the same beat, suddenly meek. Style is at times weirdly showy—one will slowly track out as the characters talk before just lying there—and maybe they’d seem less weird if not for the lack of score, acting style etc.

Waltz With Bashir (Ari Folman, 2008)
Ending is very Night and Fog, but as far as stringently ethical treatments of real-life atrocity go, this is for the most part laid-back, to its benefit. (Because why should Folman deny that, despite the undercurrent of sadness in his discussions of the massacre, he trades and enjoys stupid barbs like “It’s a blast,” with his old buddies, as most would?) Most battle scenes, as a general rule, tend to bore me, either because a filmmaker strives to approximate the chaos of war and loses narrative coherence in the process, or in the reverse case, where we’re pinned down to a single perspective, drowns in monotony; both options are satisfyingly plausible and usually dull. That said, I was rarely bored during this film: encounters of otherworldly tension are situated in retroactive melancholy.

America, America (Elia Kazan, 1963)

mixed:

Days and Nights in the Forest (Satyajit Ray, 1970)
Favorite bit: the memory game, perhaps because Ray is so adept at the language of melodrama that when he veers from it entirely, the effect is kind of magical. Not a very imposing movie, but not a particularly expressive one, either.

No Smoking (Alain Resnais, 1993)
Nobody seems to be able to account for Resnais’ infatuation with Alan Ayckbourn, least of all Ayckbourn himself. Mostly too mannered for my taste, and the formal gamesmanship isn’t anywhere near as deliberate or complex as in Private Fears in Public Places. Resnais does lend light, poetic consideration to crass characterizations, particularly in the way scenes close.

Ponyo on the Cliffs by the Sea (Hayao Miyazaki, 2008)
Sometimes I don’t know whether to enjoy the “subversive” quality of Miyazaki’s all-out warmth for his supernatural characters, which counteracts the banality of cackling cartoon villains, or to feel that it’s tediously cozy.

Literature:

PRO:

Diary of a Bad Year (J.M. Coetzee, 2007)
I’ve liked everything I’ve read by Coetzee, but this is my favorite, a conceptually gimmicky novel whose three-pronged design, to my mind, anticipates and negotiates with just about every conceivable intelligent criticism it invites. It’s not hard to imagine a potentially great writer who loves Dostoevsky, longs to approximate his greatness, feels vaguely insecure about his own storytelling abilities, not to mention conquered by lust, but it’s somehow inspiring that that skeletal, somewhat pathetic profile has been transformed into a masterpiece.

Anna Karenina (Leo Tolstoy, 1877)
When Tolstoy attempts to write anything conclusive about human nature, he often ends up chasing his own tail (e.g., much of War and Peace)—which is what makes this novel, in which he observes Levin doing the same and becoming conscious of it in a productive way, superior to that one.

pro:

After Dark (Haruki Murakami, 2004)
Murakami constructs stories of delicate intricacy for the sole purpose of leaving them hanging and watching them flutter in the wind, as usual. This feat is so impressive that the worldview tying it all together, a vaguely mystical summation of Japanese urban life, feels like an afterthought.

Theater:

pro:

Speed-the-Plow (Neil Pepe, 2009)
Seen with William H. Macy in the central role, who seems more suited to the apparently aging, insecure Bobby Gould than thermometer manqué Jeremy Piven anyway. The chief hook—Bobby is wisely stupid, Karen is stupidly wise—bristles with intelligence, even when it’s smothered by cleverness.